Management accounting assignment is held responsible for managing the organisational activities as well as their funds in effective manner. To manage their activities they prepare different policies. BRUNEI Co. follows the budgeting process to manage their liquid funds that helps in balancing their cash flows. Different budgeting methods will be discussed and utilised. They will make their performance evaluation with the use of variance analysis.
The administrative procedures having three steps process that get utilised in budgeting process. Below three steps get discussed such as:
Budgeting process is denoted as strategic management tool and it get utilised for forecasting and decision making. Below are the stages involved in budgeting process such as:
Given data:
Months |
Units |
Costs |
Jan |
6,200 |
£69,700 |
Feb |
3,500 |
£45,300 |
March |
3,100 |
£44,100 |
April |
4,900 |
£64,100 |
May |
7,100 |
£88,100 |
June |
4,200 |
£57,800 |
Formula: Variable cost per unit = Total cost (high cost - low cost) / Total units (High level unit - low level unit)
Particulars |
Amount |
High cost |
£88,100 |
Low cost |
£44,100 |
High units |
7,100 |
Low units |
3,100 |
Per unit variable cost = (88,100 - 44,100) / (7,100 - 3,100)
= 44,000/4000 = £11 per unit (Liou, 2011)
Calculation of fixed and variable cost using high low method such as: -
At high level
Particulars |
Amount |
At 7,100 units |
|
Variable cost (7,100 units * £11/ unit) |
£78,100 |
Fixed cost (£88,100 - £78,100) |
£10,000 |
At low level
Particulars |
Amount |
At 3,100 units |
|
Variable cost (3,100 units * £11/ unit) |
£34,100 |
Fixed cost (£44,100 - £34,100) |
£10,000 |
Analysis: In the above tables variable and fixed cost get calculated in order to segregate the semi-variable cost of organisation. Previous years costs as well as units get utilised for the purpose of making calculation with the use of high low method. In calculation high and low costs as well as units get utilised (Liou, 2011).
BRUNIE Co. follow two costing methods for making inventory evaluation and profit determination such as:
For inventory valuation and profit determination they make use of the marginal costing as they include all the variable costs for their calculation without inclusion of fixed cost as it is not incurred directly over the production of their product. It helps in focusing over the direct costs that has fluctuations on the other hand fixed cost having same nature during whole process. There is effective level of differentiation among the marginal costing and absorption costing for the purpose of profit determination such as: -
Differentiation shows in below table such as:
Job Costing |
Batch costing |
Process costing |
Service Costing |
Cost calculation is based over cost of every order. |
Cost calculation make inclusion of the batch or unit of same product. |
Production process include lots of steps and each step is taken in to consideration for cost calculation. |
Organisation renders services instead of products and cost is calculated over services only. |
Different and unique products are included and it can be termed as customised products. |
In batch standardized products are included. |
At every step or process product is easily differentiated. |
Services are considered instead of products. |
Under this costing type products size is small. |
The size of batch is big as there are lots of products included under it. |
Size get varies as it can be small or big. |
Services are rendered and cost is calculated over them only. |
Customised industry follows this type of method. |
Most of the standardised industry follows it. |
Majority of standardised industry follows it. |
Both type of industry whether it is customised or standardised follow this method. |
|
slim |
soccer |
Decani |
|
£ |
£ |
£ |
selling price |
50 |
58 |
70 |
purchasing price |
32 |
36 |
44 |
gross profit |
18 |
22 |
26 |
Profit and loss account for area East and West such as:
area |
|
east |
west |
total |
||
gross profit: |
|
|
£ |
|
£ |
£ |
|
slim |
94000*18 |
1,692,000.00 |
32000*18 |
576,000.00 |
2,268,000.00 |
|
soccer |
45000*22 |
990,000.00 |
46000*22 |
1,012,000.00 |
2,002,000.00 |
|
decani |
26000*26 |
676,000.00 |
42000*26 |
1,092,000.00 |
1,768,000.00 |
|
|
|
3,358,000.00 |
|
2,680,000.00 |
6,038,000.00 |
Packaging |
|
|
437768.24 |
|
162231.76 |
|
Advertising |
|
|
486315.79 |
|
353684.21 |
|
Transport |
|
|
335291.96 |
|
264708.04 |
|
total cost |
|
|
1259375.99 |
|
780624.01 |
|
Profit |
|
|
2098624.01 |
|
1899375.99 |
|
Working notes: Cost apportionment
Workings |
|
|
|
|
|
|
cost app. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
basis of App. |
|
|
|
|
|
Packaging |
no of orders |
East |
85000 |
(220000+380000)/116500 |
|
5.15 |
|
|
West |
31500 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
116500 |
|
|
|
Advertising |
sales units |
East |
165000 |
(280000+560000)/285000 |
|
2.95 |
|
|
West |
120000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
285000 |
|
|
|
Transport |
|
East |
9130000 |
(350000+250000)/16338000 |
|
£ 0.037 |
|
|
West |
7208000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
16338000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Slim |
soccer |
decani |
|
|
East |
S.P. |
50 |
58 |
70 |
|
|
|
no of units |
94000 |
45000 |
26000 |
|
|
|
total sales value |
4700000 |
2610000 |
1820000 |
9130000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Slim |
soccer |
decani |
|
|
West |
S.P. |
50 |
58 |
70 |
|
|
|
no of units |
32000 |
46000 |
42000 |
|
|
|
total sales value |
1600000 |
2668000 |
2940000 |
7208000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Profit and loss account for west only such as:
Marginal Costing |
|
Slim |
Soccer |
Decani |
Total |
|
|
£ |
£ |
£ |
£ |
gross profit per unit |
|
18 |
22 |
26 |
|
no. of units |
|
32000 |
46000 |
42000 |
|
gross profit |
|
576000 |
1012000 |
1092000 |
2680000 |
Packaging |
|
£12,274.68 |
£28,326.18 |
£18,884.12 |
£59,484.98 |
Advertising |
|
£31,438.60 |
£45,192.98 |
£41,263.16 |
£117,894.74 |
Transport |
|
£34,275.92 |
£57,155.10 |
£62,982.01 |
£154,413.02 |
TVC |
|
£77,989.20 |
£130,674.26 |
£123,129.28 |
£331,792.74 |
contribution |
|
£498,010.80 |
£881,325.74 |
£968,870.72 |
£2,348,207.26 |
fixed cost |
(380000+560000+250000)-331792.74 |
|
|
|
858207.26 |
Profit |
|
|
|
|
£1,490,000.00 |
Working notes: Cost Apportionment
Particulars |
Basis of apport. |
Calculations |
|
Results |
|
Packaging |
no of orders |
220000/116500 |
|
£1.89 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Advertising |
sales units |
280000/285000 |
|
£0.98 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Transport |
|
350000/16338000 |
|
£0.02 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Slim |
soccer |
decani |
|
west |
s.p |
50 |
58 |
70 |
|
|
no of units |
32000 |
46000 |
42000 |
|
|
total sales value |
1600000 |
2668000 |
2940000 |
7208000 |
Get assignment help from full time dedicated experts of locus assignments.
Call us: +44 – 7497 786 317Calculation of contribution without A & D:
details |
B |
E |
TOTAL |
|
£'000 |
£'000 |
£'000 |
SALES |
1100 |
1200 |
2300 |
|
|
|
0 |
MATERIAL |
-290 |
-290 |
-580 |
LABOUR |
-280 |
-280 |
-560 |
VAR OVERHEADS |
-250 |
-280 |
-530 |
FIXED OH |
-300 |
-300 |
-600 |
PROFIT/(LOSS) |
-20 |
50 |
30 |
ORIGINAL PROFIT |
130 |
200 |
|
CHANGE |
-150 |
-150 |
|
Calculation of contribution made by A & D:
|
A |
D |
SALES |
760 |
900 |
MATERIAL |
-185 |
-290 |
LABOUR |
-240 |
-280 |
VAR OH |
-210 |
-310 |
TOTAL VAR. COSTS |
-635 |
-880 |
CONTRIBUTION |
125 |
20 |
Analysis: BRUNEI Co. management propose to close down the production of Product A & D as it is considered that they lead to loss situation. As per the results of the profit calculation without inclusion of A & D results that Product B is yielding loss whereas Product E yields only minor profit. With the inclusion of Product A & D it is clearly observed that they are not attaining huge profits but they didn't attain loss and with the help their sales they easily meet out their expenditure and earn adequate level of profits for their business. Now it is suggested that they need not to close down the production of Product A & D (Libby & Lindsay, 2010).
Calculation is in below table such as:
Details |
A |
B |
D |
E |
TOTAL |
|
£'000 |
£'000 |
£'000 |
£'000 |
£'000 |
SALES |
760 |
1100 |
900 |
1200 |
3960 |
MATERIAL |
-185 |
-290 |
-290 |
-290 |
-1055 |
LABOUR |
-240 |
-280 |
-280 |
-280 |
-1080 |
VAR OVERHEADS |
-210 |
-250 |
-310 |
-280 |
-1050 |
TOTAL VAR. COSTS |
-635 |
-820 |
-880 |
-850 |
-3185 |
CONTRIBUTION |
125 |
280 |
20 |
350 |
775 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
CONTRIBUTION TO SALES RATIO |
16.45% |
25.45% |
2.22% |
29.17% |
19.57% |
Breakeven point = Total fixed cost / contribution to sales ratio
Total fixed cost = 600
Contribution to sales ratio = 0.1957
= 600/0.1957 = 3,065.806
Breakeven point = £3,605.806 (Pollack, 2014)
Targeted sales = Total fixed cost + targeted profit/ contribution to sales ratio
Total fixed cost = 600
Targeted profit = 200
Contribution to sales ratio = 0.1957
= 600 +200/ 0.1957
= 800/0.1957= 4,087.742
Required sales = 4,087.742 (Pollack, 2014)
Particulars |
A |
B |
D |
E |
TOTAL |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Labour cost |
240000 |
280000 |
280000 |
280000 |
1080000 |
|
Lab. Cost/hr |
10 |
10 |
10 |
10 |
10 |
|
No. of lab. Hrs/product |
24000 |
28000 |
28000 |
28000 |
108000 |
Hrs. needed |
|
|
|
|
|
98000 |
Hrs. available |
|
|
|
|
|
-10000 |
Hrs. Shortage |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
A |
B |
D |
E |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
No. of lab. Hrs/product |
24000 |
28000 |
28000 |
28000 |
|
|
Contribution |
£ 125,000 |
£ 280,000 |
£ 20,000 |
£ 350,000 |
|
|
Contribution/lab. Hr. |
£ 5.21 |
£ 10.00 |
£ 0.71 |
£ 12.50 |
|
|
Ranking |
3 |
2 |
4 |
1 |
|
|
Product mix: -
Product |
Sales value |
No. of Lab. Hrs |
Contribution / lab hr. |
Total contribution |
|
E |
£1,200,000 |
28000 |
£12.50 |
£ 350,000 |
|
B |
£1,100,000 |
28000 |
£10.00 |
£ 280,000 |
|
A |
£760,000 |
24000 |
£5.21 |
£ 125,000 |
|
|
|
80000 |
|
|
|
D |
£ 578,571.43 |
18000 |
£ 0.71 |
£ 12,857.14 |
|
|
TOTAL |
98000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
£ 767,857.14 |
Maximised Cont. |
|
|
|
|
£ 600,000.00 |
Less: Total FC |
|
|
|
|
£ 167,857.14 |
Maximised Profit |
If there is an extra 8,000 Hrs. available then the profit will arise by: -
8,000 hrs. * 0.71 = £5,714.29
Increase in profit is by £5,714.29 (Alino & Schneider, 2012)
The amount of direct materials purchases in each of the month is as follows such as:
|
|
July |
Aug |
Sept |
|
|
£ |
£ |
£ |
|
closing stock |
11500 |
16000 |
13000 |
add |
usage |
22000 |
28000 |
32000 |
|
|
33500 |
44000 |
45000 |
less |
opening stock |
16000 |
11500 |
16000 |
|
material purchase costs |
£ 17,500.00 |
£ 32,500.00 |
£ 29,000.00 |
Cash budget for the three months such as July, August and September is as follows such as:
|
|
July |
August |
September |
|
Receipts |
£ |
£ |
£ |
|
cash sales |
43500 |
48000 |
57000 |
|
receivables |
60000 |
101500 |
112000 |
|
Total Receipts |
103500 |
149500 |
169000 |
|
Payments |
|
|
|
|
wages |
38000 |
42000 |
47500 |
|
overheads |
16000 |
20500 |
24500 |
|
purchase of direct materials |
17500 |
32500 |
29000 |
|
tax bill |
|
|
78000 |
|
Total Payments |
71500 |
95000 |
179000 |
|
Net Receipts/ (Payments) |
32000 |
54500 |
-10000 |
|
Opening Cash Balance |
15000 |
47000 |
101500 |
|
Closing Cash Balance |
47000 |
101500 |
91500 |
The advantages of preparing cash budgets are as follows:
They need to shorten the time period for their debt collection to increase the level of their revenues earned.
There is requirement of enhancing their credit policy for the purpose of better cash inflows.
They need to restrict the unnecessary spending that results into huge savings.
In order to lower down the ratio of salaries and wages they need to hire skilled labour that helps in making effective savings (M Peter 2010).
Flexed budget as well as calculation of total variances is in below table such as:
|
Particulars |
original budget |
flexed budget |
actual budget |
variances |
|
|
sales units |
8100 |
8400 |
8400 |
|
|
|
production units |
8900 |
9100 |
9100 |
|
|
|
|
£ |
£ |
£ |
£ |
|
|
Sales |
793800 |
823200 |
798000 |
-25200 |
adverse |
|
Materials |
195800 |
200200 |
170455 |
29745 |
favourable |
|
Labour |
267000 |
273000 |
244515 |
28485 |
favourable |
|
variable overheads |
106800 |
109200 |
89348 |
19852 |
favourable |
|
fixed overheads |
160200 |
163800 |
136074 |
27726 |
favourable |
|
production cost |
729800 |
746200 |
640392 |
|
|
|
less closing inventory |
65600 |
57400 |
57400 |
|
|
less |
cost of sales |
664200 |
688800 |
582992 |
|
|
|
Profit |
129600 |
134400 |
215008 |
80608 |
favourable |
a. Materials
Material price variance |
|
£ |
|
|
actual cost of material for 36464 kg |
|
|
£ 170,455.00 |
|
36464 kg @ std cost of £5.50/kg |
|
|
£ 200,552.00 |
|
|
|
|
£ 30,097.00 |
Fav. |
material usage variance (explain) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
actual usage |
|
|
36464 |
Kg |
std usage for the actual production |
|
|
|
|
|
9100 @ 4kg |
|
36400 |
Kg |
|
|
|
-64 |
Adv |
|
|
at std cost of £5.50 |
-£ 352.00 |
Adv |
|
|
|
|
|
total material variance=30097-352= |
|
|
£ 29,745.00 |
Fav. |
Particulars |
Variances |
F or UF |
Causes |
Actions |
Material price |
£ 30,097 |
F |
Availability of low quality material. Unnecessary wastage get increased. Fluctuations in its prices |
Purchase good quality material Allocate raw-material following EOQ method Follow quality standards. |
Material usage |
64 kg |
A |
b. Labour
Particulars |
|
|
£ |
|
Labour rate variance |
||||
actual hours paid at actual cost |
|
|
244515 |
|
actual hours at std cost (46400 hrs @£5) |
|
|
232000 |
|
|
|
|
-12515 |
A |
labour idle time variance |
|
|
|
|
|
no. of actual labour hrs paid |
|
46400 |
|
|
no. of actual labour hrs worked |
|
45100 |
|
|
|
|
1300 |
|
1300 hrs @ std cost of £5 |
|
|
-6500 |
A |
labour efficiency variance |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Hrs |
|
actual hrs worked |
|
|
45100 |
|
std hrs worked on actual production |
|
|
|
|
|
9100*6 |
|
54600 |
|
|
|
|
9500 |
F |
|
9500 hrs @ std cost |
|
£ 47,500.00 |
F |
|
|
|
|
|
total labour variance= |
|
47500-6500-12515 = |
£ 28,485.00 |
F |
Particulars |
Variances |
F or UF |
Causes |
Actions |
Labour rate variance |
-12515 |
A |
High adverse labour idle time. Increase in the over shift work Increase in unskilled labour ratio. High fluctuation in labour rates |
Minimise the idle time ratio. Remove over shift facility Introduce new machinery. Focus on hiring skilled labours |
Labour idle time variance |
-6500 |
A |
||
Labour efficiency variance |
47,500 |
F |
c. Variable overheads
Variance Overhead |
|
|
£ |
|
actual hours worked@ actual cost |
|
|
89348 |
|
actual hours worked@ std cost |
|
45100*£2 |
90200 |
|
|
|
|
£ 852.00 |
F |
|
|
|
|
|
variable overheads efficiency variance |
|
|
|
|
actual hours worked |
|
|
45100 |
|
std hrs for the actual production |
|
9100*6 |
54600 |
|
|
|
|
9500 |
|
|
at std cost@ £2 |
|
£ 19,000.00 |
F |
|
|
|
|
|
total variable overheads variance= 852+19000= |
|
|
£19852 |
F |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Particulars |
Variances |
F or UF |
Causes |
Actions |
Variable overhead capacity |
£852 |
F |
Available resources utilised in adequate manner. Set plans get followed in effective manner. |
Build adequate contract that helps in reducing price fluctuations. Allocate resources in efficient manner. |
Variable overhead efficiency |
£19,852 |
F |
d. Fixed overheads
fixed overheads variance |
|
Calculation |
Results |
|
|
|
|
£ |
|
actual fixed overheads |
|
|
136074 |
|
original budget total |
|
|
160200 |
|
|
|
|
£ 24,126.00 |
F |
|
|
|
|
|
capacity variance |
|
|
Hrs |
|
actual hours worked |
|
|
45100 |
|
budgeted hours |
|
8900*6 |
53400 |
|
|
|
|
8300 |
A |
|
at std cost of £3 |
8300*£3 |
£ 24,900.00 |
A |
|
|
|
|
|
fixed overheads efficiency variance |
|
|
|
|
actual hours worked |
|
|
45100 |
|
std hrs worked for the actual production |
|
|
|
|
|
|
9100*6 |
54600 |
|
|
|
|
9500 |
F |
|
at std cost of £3 |
9500*£3 |
£ 28,500.00 |
F |
|
|
|
|
|
total fixed overheads variance |
|
24126-24900+28500 = |
£ 27,726.00 |
F |
Particulars |
Variances |
F or UF |
Causes |
Actions |
Fixed overhead variance |
£ 24,126 |
F |
Management having poor estimations. The accuracy level of available information is not adequate.
|
Put emphasis over facts and figures for decision making process. Review the information reliability before using. |
capacity variance |
£24,900 |
A |
||
Fixed overhead efficiency |
28,500 |
F |
e. Sales variance
Sales price variance |
|
Calculation |
Results |
|
|
|
|
£ |
|
actual sales at actual selling price |
|
|
798000 |
|
actual sales at std selling price |
|
8400*98 |
823200 |
|
|
|
|
-25200 |
A |
|
|
|
|
|
sales volume variance |
|
|
units |
|
|
actual sales |
|
8400 |
|
|
budgeted sales |
|
8100 |
|
|
|
|
300 |
F |
profit (std profit of £129600/8100) = £16 |
|
|
£ 4,800.00 |
F |
Particulars |
Variances |
F or UF |
Causes |
Actions |
Sales price variance |
25,200 |
A |
Fall in the prices of product. Product get sold over high discount rates. Set prices get affected due to substitute products. |
Improve the quality of products. Set prices by reviewing competitors prices. |
Sales volume variance |
300 |
F |
e. Prepare a statement reconciling the budgeted profits to the actual profit
Reconciliation statement of the variances such as:
Particulars |
£ |
£ |
Budgeted profits |
|
£ 129,600.00 |
Budgeted fixed production overheads |
|
£ 160,200.00 |
Budgeted contribution |
|
£ 289,800.00 |
Selling Price Variance |
-£ 25,200.00 |
|
Sales Volume Variance |
£ 4,800.00 |
-£ 20,400.00 |
Actual sales minus the standard variable cost of sales |
|
£ 269,400.00 |
Variable cost variances: |
|
|
Material price variance |
£ 30,097.00 |
|
Material usage variance |
-£ 352.00 |
£ 29,745.00 |
Labour rate |
-£ 12,515.00 |
|
Labour idle time |
-£ 6,500.00 |
|
Labour efficiency |
£ 47,500.00 |
£ 28,485.00 |
Variable cost variances |
£ 852.00 |
|
Variable efficiency |
£ 19,000.00 |
£ 19,852.00 |
Actual Contribution |
|
£ 347,482.00 |
Budgeted Fixed Production Overheads |
-£ 160,200.00 |
|
Fixed cost expenditure variance |
£ 24,126.00 |
|
Capacity Variance |
-£ 24,900.00 |
|
Fixed cost efficiency variance |
£ 28,500.00 |
|
Actual Fixed Production Overheads |
|
-£ 132,474.00 |
Actual Profit |
|
£ 215,008.00 |
To,
The Board of Directors,
BRUNEI Co.
Subject: - Report on variances
Date: - XX-XX-XXXX
Sir/Madam,
This report is represented in order to aware about the overall performance of the organisation. The results of variance analysis showcase that different requirements require adequate level of improvements. These variances get utilised for the effective decision making and for these variances different departmental managers are responsible such as:
Variance |
Responsible manager |
Material variance |
Production manager |
Labour Variance |
Labour manager or Human resource management |
Variable overhead |
Departmental managers |
Fixed overhead |
Departmental managers |
Sales variance |
Sales manager |
Conclusion: Management of BRUNEI Co. need to emphasis over their performance enhancement. On the basis of calculated variances management need to put emphasis over improving the performance of the different department as per their variance level. Management need to focus over motivated their employees so that they perform their efficiently.
From:
Management Accountant
(Pilleboue, et. al., 2015)
(i) Breakeven point
Breakeven point = Total Fixed cost / Contribution per unit
Total fixed cost = salaries & wages + rent & rates + other fixed costs
= £260,000 + £75,000 + £345,000
Total fixed cost = £680,000
Contribution per unit = Per unit selling price - Per unit buying price
Per unit selling price = £68
Per unit buying price = £53
Contribution per unit = £68 - £53 = £15
Breakeven point = £680,000/ £15 = 45,333.33 units
Breakeven point = Fixed cost/ PV ratio
Fixed cost = = £260,000 + £75,000 + £345,000 = £680,000
PV ratio = Per unit contribution / Selling price per unit * 100
= £15/ £68 * 100 = 22.06%
= £680,000 / 22.06% = £3,082,502
Breakeven point = £3,082,502 (Simakov, et. al., 2015)
(ii) Margin of safety
Margin of safety = Total sales - breakeven point
Total sales = 56,000 * 68 = £3,808,000
Break-even point = £3,082,502
Margin of safety = £3,808,000 - £3,082,502 = £725,498
Margin of safety = £725,498 (Simakov, et. al., 2015)
In the below table calculation of profit or loss over sale of 40,500 pairs of shoes such as:
Particulars |
Calculation |
Amount |
Sales (A) |
(40,500 units* £68) |
£2,754,000 |
Purchase price (B) |
(40,500 units* £53) |
£2,146,500 |
Contribution (A -B = C) |
(40,500 units * £15) |
£607,500 |
Fixed cost (D) |
NA |
£680,000 |
Profit/Loss (C - D) |
NA |
(£72,500) |
With the sales of the 40,500 pairs of shoes there will be loss of £72,500 (Li, et. al., 2014)
Formulae of revised sales = Total fixed cost + desired profit / revised contribution
Fixed cost = £680,000
Desired profit = £180,025
Revised contribution = £15 - £2= £13/ unit
Revised sales = (£680,000 + £180,025) / £13 = 66,156 units.
In the below table above revised sales is tested whether it is correct or not such as:
Particulars |
Calculation |
Amount |
Sales (A) |
(66,156 units * £68/ unit) |
£4,498,603 |
Purchase price (B) |
(66,156 units * £55/ unit) |
£3,638,580 |
Contribution (A -B = C) |
(66,156 units * £13/ unit) |
£860,027 |
Fixed cost (D) |
|
£680,000 |
Profit/Loss (C - D) |
|
£180,025 |
The revised sales of 66,156 units results into attaining a additional profit of £180,025. (Li, et. al., 2014)
There is increment in selling prices by 10% so new selling price is = £68 + (£68* 10%) = £74.8
New contribution = New selling prices - Buying prices
= £74.8 - £53 = £21.8
New fixed cost = £680,000 + £25,000 = £705,000
New breakeven point = (£705,000 / £21.8) = 32,340 units or 32,339.45 units
If there is increase in selling price by 10% and fixed cost get increased by £21.8 as advertising campaign then the new break-even point is 32,339.45 units (Li, et. al., 2014).
The calculation made in the above sections helps in analysing that break-even point get decreased with the increase in the selling price. Earlier the breakeven point was 45,333.33 units that get reduced to 32,339.45 units by increasing the selling price by 10% only. By increasing selling price they recover their incurred cost at rapid pace. Breakeven point is at par situation in which organization didn't get losses nor earn profits. When the breakeven point is low then organisation having chance to earn high profits and vice-versa. So it recommended to increase their selling process along with adopt the marketing campaign (Li, et. al., 2014).
It is concluded that BRUNEI Co. utilised different budgeting method to make adequate use of their available finance. They make cost classification in order to make best utilisation of their cost. They make different use of their prepared budget such as they evaluate performance, extract useful information in their decision making process and many more. They follow the prepared budget in order to process the activities systematically and as per their desired level. In the end they perform variance analysis for the purpose of evaluating their performance so that they make improvements in their processing.
Alino, N.U. & Schneider, G.P. 2012, "Conflict reduction in organization design: budgeting and accounting control systems", Academy of Strategic Management Journal, vol. 11, no. 1, pp. 1.
Anessi-Pessina, E., Barbera, C., Sicilia, M. & Steccolini, I. 2016, "Public sector budgeting: a European review of accounting and public management journals", Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, vol. 29, no. 3, pp. 491-519.
Brook, D.A. 2012, "Budgeting for national security: a whole of government perspective", Journal of Public Budgeting, Accounting & Financial Management, vol. 24, no. 1, pp. 32.
Butt, M. 2010, "Variance analysis", Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, vol. 23, no. 6, pp. 816-816.
Easterday, K.E. & Eaton, T.V. 2012, "Double (accounting) standards: a comparison of public and private sector defined benefit pension plans", Journal of Public Budgeting, Accounting & Financial Management, vol. 24, no. 2, pp. 278.
Details
Other Assignments
Related Solution
Other Solution